Starbucks advertises Corporate Social Responsibility
By Steve | May 22, 2006
I read the New York Times online. Usually I ignore the advertising--or try to. Whether or not I am successful is a matter debated by advertising specialists. At any rate, the other day I was not successful at ignoring the Starbucks banner ad telling viewers to go to their website to read their Corporate Social Responsibility Report.
A banner ad promoting a Corporate Social Responsibility Report! Granted, it is Starbucks, but this still seems to me to mark a new phase in publicly telling one's story of commitment to doing the right thing.
Meanwhile, many companies, even some large marketers of consumer products, still do not publish corporate responsibility reports. Company leaders tell me that they "do not want to attract attention" to their practices in these areas, because "once you do, 'they' either want more and more" or "'they' keep looking for where you fall short, and attack you all the more."
"They" of course, are NGOs, activists, and Socially Responsible Investment funds.
This may have been a plausible argument a decade ago. But the landscape has changed. Companies are defined by outsiders no matter what. In this environment, management has a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders to help define the company's reputation. Corporate responsibility reports and speeches like Boeing CEO Jim McNerny's at The Conference Board are ideas worthy of serious consideration.
Dow CEO Andrew Liveris, in his recent speech to The Conference Board, described Dow's journey to broader engagement as "the five Ds."
Discovery--when the company learned that reputation mattered even when they thought they were doing the right thing.
Defense--when they tried to defend themselves from criticism, using sound science.
Debate--when they engaged critics in discussion of key issues.
Discussion--when they "actually began to incorporate many of the ideas of critics" in how they operate.
Doing--when they began to set specific goals and metrics, and made progress toward them public.
What stage is your company on?




Comments
Steve: Nice commentary, though I'm not sure I agree entirely with it. I do agree with much of it; I'm a big fan of transparency, and I think Starbucks has produced a truly fine and very effective report. I'm at the point, however, where I think some companies need to take a step back and evaluate who citizenship reports are for and what benefit they serve for the company. Perhaps there is an equally effective, or even more effective tool for certain companies to communicate with their relevant stakeholders that may not involve the investment of time and resources necessary to produce today's state-of-the-art citizenship report. CR reports are exactly right for many companies -- perhaps for most. But certainly not for all.
Posted by: Phil Rudolph | May 25, 2006 03:21 PM