• › History and Values › Ethics and Compliance › Corporate Responsibility › Our People › We Work Globally › We Work Across Industries › Billing and Other Sensitive Topics
  • › Assessment › Communications › Training › Strategy › Implementation
  • › Ethics and Compliance Blog › Corporate Responsibility Blog › Articles and Research › Organizations and Websites › Calendar
« Senator Stevens guilty—and who else? | Main | What if nobody would ever find out? »

DoJ encourages employees to file qui tam lawsuits

By Steve | November 16, 2008

by Steve Priest, President of Ethical Leadership Group, a Global Compliance Company

A US Department of Justice press release this month trumpeted the $1.34 Billion it has collected in settlements and judgments in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. "Now, more than ever, it is crucial that taxpayer dollars aren't lost to fraud," said Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General for the Department's Civil Division. "The billion dollars collected this year is only part of the story. By rooting out fraud and vigorously pursuing it, the Department, with the help of concerned citizens who report fraud in hotline calls and in qui tam complaints, undoubtedly saves the country many times that amount in aborted schemes and misconduct."

The government notched its belt by noting cases against Merck ($361M), Cephalon ($258M), Amerigroup ($225M), Kyphon (now Medtronic Spine LLC) ($75M), Staten Island University Hospitals ($74M), Lester E. Cox Medical Centers ($60M), Pratt & Whitney ($50M), PCC Airfoils ($2M), St. Joseph’s Hospital of Atlanta ($26M), Bechtel + PB Americas ($23M US and $40M Mass.), and CVS/Caremark ($21M). Most of these cases originated years earlier, so for those students of the field these are old news.

What is most notable about this press release, however, is the extent to which the DoJ celebrates the role of relators in these cases. Relators are the individuals, usually employees but sometimes contractors or other informed (or semi-informed) parties, who file suit on behalf of the government against those who have fraudulently claimed federal funds.

Assistant Attorney General Katsas paid tribute to Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa and Representative Howard L. Berman of California, sponsors of the 1986 amendments to the False Claims Act. "Without this important legislation strengthening the Act and, in particular, the qui tam provisions which encourage private citizens to uncover government fraud, such recoveries would not have been possible."

The DoJ highlighted the fact that almost 78 percent of this year's recoveries were associated with suits initiated by relators. They celebrated that relators received over $198 million dollars. And in most of the cases cited above, they noted the amount the relator received. (e.g., Amerigroup $56M, Merck $46M).

We don’t quarrel with the ultimate goal of the Department of Justice to minimize fraud against taxpayers. Indeed, that is one of our goals too. However, as a result of our fifteen years of work in the field, we know about the ethics and compliance efforts of some of the companies on the DoJ list. While no individual or company is perfect, some of these programs are quite good. And we wonder whether the companies involved were given the opportunity to put their own houses in order. Did these relators give the internal systems a chance? Or were they so tempted by the multi-million dollar lottery ticket offered by the government that they did not use the internal helpline or other internal systems?

That is a frightening thought for companies trying to do the right thing. Here’s one more: this press release came from the DoJ during an administration where deregulation was the animating philosophy, at least for a long while. What happens next year?

I humbly suggest that it is time to do a thorough examination of your compliance and reputational risks. A pretty small price to pay vs. the alternatives. Please contact me at steve.priest@ethicalleadershipgroup.com if you have any questions about conducting a forward looking risk assessment.

Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ethicalleadershipgroup.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/90

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)





Who is ELG?

ELG was founded in 1993 and has since done work in more than 40 countries with over 25% of the Fortune 200

About this page

This blog contains personal reflections and commentary on corporate responsibility by the consultants of Ethical Leadership Group. It is intended to communicate short, timely items of interest to our clients and colleagues. We look forward to your comments. Please visit our Ethics and Compliance Blog for more general ethics and compliance issues.

ELG People

Steve Priest
Mary Bennett
John Brown
Carrie Penman
Ed Petry
Phil Rudolph
Santiago Zorzopulos Reich

Subscribe to this blog

Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

Published Writings by ELG consultants

Climate Change: Tilting at Windmills - the rush on renewables
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

Hewlett-Packard and ‘pretexting’ - A rose by any other name
from the website of Ethical Corporation Magazine

Starting to ‘Get’ Responsibility
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

Invite Your Lawyers to the Corporate Responsibility Dance
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

The Anti-CSR Lobby: House of Straw
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

Making the Business Case for the Business Case
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

Ethical Reporting and the Law
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

Ethical Sourcing – Good News for Industry-wide Initiatives
from the website of Ethical Corporation Magazine

When Mars meets Venus
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

Reputation Roulette
from the website of Ethical Corporation Magazine

TXU Takeover – How Capitalism is really Turning Green
from Ethical Corporation Magazine

Published Writings quoting ELG consultants

Corporate America's Hidden Risks
by Mark Gunther, from Fortune Magazine

Win or Lose in Court
by Bill Baue, from Business Ethics magazine

Links

ELG's website

ELG's Ethics and Compliance Blog

Ethics and Compliance Officer Association

Society of Corporate Compliance & Ethics

Business for Social Responsibility

The Business Ethics Blog

Search


Categories

  • International
  • Legal
  • Surveys
  • Travel

Archives

  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

Recent Posts

  • What if nobody would ever find out?
  • DoJ encourages employees to file qui tam lawsuits
  • Senator Stevens guilty—and who else?
  • Digital is different
  • Working through an economic 9/11
  • Set your Tivo
  • Does your whistleblower program offend pig farmers in Iowa?
  • Lynn Turner’s Seven Steps
  • Does it matter if banks fudge their numbers a little?
  • Crisis of Trust
Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2